**Page description appears here**

“Structural Observability Analysis of Large Scale Systems Using Modelica and Python”

Authors: M. Anushka S. Perera, Bernt Lie and Carlos F. Pfeiffer,
Affiliation: Telemark University College
Reference: 2015, Vol 36, No 1, pp. 53-65.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: Structural observability, Modelica, large-scale systems, CasADi, Python, graph-theory, JModelica.org, NetworkX, PyGraphviz

Abstract: State observability of dynamic systems is a notion which determines how well the states can be inferred from input-output data. For small-scale systems, observability analysis can be done manually, while for large-scale systems an automated systematic approach is advantageous. Here we present an approach based on the concept of structural observability analysis, using graph theory. This approach can be automated and applied to large-scale, complex dynamic systems modeled using Modelica. Modelica models are imported into Python via the JModelica.org-CasADi interface, and the Python packages NetworkX (for graph-theoretic analysis) and PyGraphviz (for graph layout and visualization) are used to analyze the structural observability of the systems. The method is demonstrated with a Modelica model created for the Copper production plant at Glencore Nikkelverk, Kristiansand, Norway. The Copper plant model has 39 states, 11 disturbances and 5 uncertain parameters. The possibility of estimating disturbances and parameters in addition to estimating the states are also discussed from the graph-theory point of view. All the software tools used on the analysis are freely available.

PDF PDF (1830 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2015.1.4

DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] M. Anushka S. Perera, Tor A. Hauge and Carlos F. Pfeiffer (2015), doi:10.4173/mic.2015.3.6
  [2] M. Anushka S. Perera, Tor Anders Hauge and Carlos Fernando Pfeiffer (2016), doi:10.7763/IJMO.2016.V6.540
  [3] D.W.U. Perera, M. Anushka S. Perera, Carlos F. Pfeiffer and Nils-Olav Skeie (2016), doi:10.4173/mic.2016.3.3
  [4] Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis, Claudio Roncoli and Markos Papageorgiou (2017), doi:10.1016/j.trb.2017.11.001

[1] Anh, N. T.T. (2012). Spanning Cacti for Structurally Controllable Networks, Master's thesis, Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore.
[2] Bondy, A. and Murty, U. S.R. (2008). Graph theory, Graduate texts in mathematics. Springer.
[3] Boukhobza, T. and Hemlin, F. (2007). Observability analysis for structured bilinear systems: a graph- theoretic approach, Automatica. 43(11). doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.03.010
[4] Cellier, F.E. and Kofman, E. (2006). Continuous System Simulation, Springer.
[5] Daoutidis, P. and Kravaris, C. (1992). Structural evaluation of control configurations for multivariable nonlinear processes, Chemical Engineering Science. 47:1091--1107. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(92)80234-4
[6] Jazwinski, A.H. (2007). Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory, Dove Publications, Inc., Mineola, New York.
[7] Lie, B. and Hauge, T.A. (2008). Modeling of an industrial copper leaching and electrowinning process, with validation against experimental data, Proceedings SIMS 2008, 49th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling.
[8] Lin, C.T. (1974). Structural controllability, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 19(3). doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100557
[9] Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., and Barabasi, A.-L. (2011). Controllability of complex networks, Nature. 473:167--173. doi:doi:10.1038/nature10011
[10] Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., and Barabasi, A.-L. (2012). Observability of complex systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110(7):2460--2465. doi:10.1073/pnas.1215508110
[11] Pantelides, C.C. (1988). The consistent initialization of differential-algebraic systems, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. 9(2). doi:10.1137/0909014
[12] Perera, A. (2014). Using casadi for optimization and symbolic linearization/extraction of causality graphs of modelica models via jmodelica, org. Technical Report HiT_rapport_5, Telemark University College, Kjo lnes ring 56, P.O. Box 203, N-3901 Porsgrunn, Norway.. https://teora.hit.no/handle/2282/2175.
[13] Perera, A., Pfeiffer, C., Hauge, T.A., and Lie, B. (2014). Making modelica models available for analysis in python control systems library, Proceedings SIMS 2014, 55th Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling.
[14] Astroem, K.J. (2006). Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory, Dove Publications, Inc., Mineola, New York.
[15] Reinschke, K.J. (1988). Multivariable control: a graph theoretic approach, Lecture notes in control and information sciences. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, New York. http://opac.inria.fr/record=b1086834.
[16] Simon, D. (2006). Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jerse.

  title={{Structural Observability Analysis of Large Scale Systems Using Modelica and Python}},
  author={Perera, M. Anushka S. and Lie, Bernt and Pfeiffer, Carlos F.},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


Oct 2018: MIC reaches 3000 DOI Forward Links. The last 1000 took 2 years and 5 months.

May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.