**Page description appears here**

“A Comparative Study of Actuator Configurations for Satellite Attitude Control”

Authors: Raymond Kristiansen, Olav Egeland and Per J. Nicklasson,
Affiliation: Narvik University College and NTNU, Department of Engineering Cybernetics
Reference: 2005, Vol 26, No 4, pp. 201-220.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: Reaction wheels, magnetic torquers, controllability, satellite attitude control

Abstract: In this paper a controllability study of different actuator configurations consisting of magnetic torquers, reaction wheels and a gravity boom is presented. The theoretical analysis is performed with use of controllability gramians, and simulation results with the different configurations are presented and compared regarding settling time and power consumption to substantiate the theoretical analysis. A reference model is also introduced to show how the power consumption can he lowered to the same magnitude as when magnetic torquers are used, without degrading the satellite response significantly.

PDF PDF (2389 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2005.4.2

DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] Mohammad Hossein Beheshti (2014), doi:10.5589/q14-001
  [2] Juan L. Garcia and Jose Sanchez Moreno (2014), doi:10.1007/s40295-014-0010-4
  [3] Shahin S. Nudehi, Umar Farooq, Aria Alasty and Jimmy Issa (2008), doi:10.1109/ACC.2008.4587262
  [4] Panfeng Huang, Xiudong Xu and Zhongjie Meng (2014), doi:10.5772/58848
  [5] P.J.W. Koelewijn, P.S.G. Cisneros, H. Werner and R. Tóth (2018), doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.169

[1] ANTSAKLIS, P. J. MICHEL, A. N. (1997). Linear Systems, McGraw-Hill Electrical and Computer Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
[2] ATHANS, NI. FALB, P. L. (1966). Optimal Control, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
[3] BAK, T., BLANKE, M. WISNIEWSKI, R. (1999). Flight results and lessons learned from the Ørsted attitude control system, Proceedings of the 4th ESA International Conference on Spacecraft Guidance, Navigation and Control Systems, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
[4] BAK. T. (2000). Spacecraft Attitude Determination - a Magnetometer Approach, Ph.D.. thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
[5] BALCHEN, J. G. MUMME, K.I. (1988). Process Control -Structures and Applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
[6] BØGH, S. A., WISNIEWSKI, R. BAK, T. (1997). Autonomous Attitude Control System for the Ørsted Satellite, Proceedings of the IFAC Workshop on Control of Small Spacecraft, Breckenbridge, USA.
[7] CAMPBELL, W. H. (1997). An Introduction to Geomagnetic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[8] EGELAND, O. GRAVDAHL, J. T. (2002). Modeling and Simulation for Automatic Control, Marine Cybernetics, Trondheim, Norway.
[9] GRAVDAHL J., EIDE, E., SKAVHAUG, A.. FAUSKE, K.M., SVARTVEIT, K. INDERGAARD, F. M. (2003). Three Axis Attitude Determination and Control System for a Picosatellite: Design and implementation, Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress, Bremen, Germany.
[10] KAPLAN, M. H. (1976). Modern Spacecraft Dynamics and Control, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
[11] KRISTIANSEN, R. (2000). Attitude Control of a Microsatellite, Master´s thesis. Department of Engineering Cybernetics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
[12] MARSHALL, S. V. SKITEK, G.G. (1990). Electromagnetic Concepts and Applications, Prentice-Hall International Inc, New Jersey, USA.
[13] RIISE, Å.-R., SAMUELSEN, B., SOKOLOVA, N., CEDERBLAD, H., FASSELAND, J., NORDIN, C.. OTTERSTAD, J., FAUSKE, K., ERIKSEN.O., INDERGAARD, F. M., SVARTVEIT, K., FUREBOTTEN, P., SÆTHER, E. EIDE, E. (2003). Ncube: The First Norwegian Student Satellite, Proceedings of The 17th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, Utah, USA.
[14] SIDI, M. J. (1997). Spacecraft Dynamics and Control, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
[15] STEYN, W. H. HASHIDA, Y. (1999). In-orbit Attitude and Orbit Control commissioning of UoSAT-12, Proceedings of the 4th ESA International Conference on Spacecraft Guidance, Navigation and Control Systems, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
[16] STRANG, G. (1988). Linear Algebra and its Applications, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Orlando, Florida, USA.
[17] VON SCHEELE, F. (1996). The Swedish Odin Satellite to Eye Heaven and Earth, Proceedings of the 47th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
[18] WERTZ, J. R. (1978). Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK.
[19] WIE,, B. (1998). Space Vehicle Dynamics and Control, AIAA Education Series, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.. Reston. Virginia, USA.

  title={{A Comparative Study of Actuator Configurations for Satellite Attitude Control}},
  author={Kristiansen, Raymond and Egeland, Olav and Nicklasson, Per J.},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


Oct 2018: MIC reaches 3000 DOI Forward Links. The last 1000 took 2 years and 5 months.

May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.