**Page description appears here**

“Variable selection for decentralized control”

Authors: Sigurd Skogestad and Manfred Morari,
Affiliation: NTNU, Department of Chemical Engineering and California Institute of Technology
Reference: 1992, Vol 13, No 2, pp. 113-125.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: DIC, relative gain array (RGA), steady-state, integral control, interactions

Abstract: Decentralized controllers (single-loop controllers applied to multivariable plants) are often preferred in practice because they are robust and relatively simple to understand and to change. The design of such a control system starts with pairing inputs (manipulated variables) and outputs (controlled variables). For a nxn plant there are n! possible pairings, and there is a great need for screening techniques to quickly eliminate undesirable pairings. In this paper we present several tests for eliminating pairings which are not decentralized integral controllable (DIC). A system is DIC if there exists a stabilizing decentralized controller with integral action such that the gains of the individual loops may be reduced independently without introducing instability. Note that the DIC is a property of the plant and the chosen pairings. The tests presented are in terms of different measures of the sign of the steady state gain matrix; including the RGA, the determinant and eigenvalues. The relationship to previously presented results is discussed in detail.

PDF PDF (1039 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.1992.2.3

DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] Miltiadis V. Papalexandris (2004), doi:10.1115/1.1789537
  [2] Nima Monshizadeh-Naini, Alireza Fatehi and Ali Kahki-Sedigh (2011), doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.10.008
  [3] Wolfgang Birk, Miguel Castaņo and Andreas Johansson (2014), doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.12.012
  [4] Kwang-Ki K. Kim, Sigurd Skogestad, Manfred Morari and Richard D. Braatz (2014), doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.07.023
  [5] Kurt E. Haggblom (2008), doi:10.1109/ACC.2008.4587319
  [6] P.J. Campo and M. Morari (1994), doi:10.1109/9.284869
  [7] K.E. Haggblom (1997), doi:10.1109/CDC.1997.657774
  [8] Ali Reza Mehrabian and Caro Lucas (2006), doi:10.1109/IS.2006.348444
  [9] Mostafa Eslami and Amin Nobakhti (2015), doi:10.1109/TAC.2015.2444111
  [10] Yi ZHANG, Steven Weidong Su, Andrey Savkin, Branko Celler and Hung Nguyen (2017), doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02165
  [11] Miguel Castaņo Arranz, Wolfgang Birk and George Nikolakopoulos (2017), doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1536
  [12] Kurt E. Haggblom (2017), doi:10.1109/CCTA.2017.8062494

[1] BRISTOL, E. H. (1966). On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 11, 133-134 doi:10.1109/TAC.1966.1098266
[2] DOYLE, J. C. (1982). Analysis of feedback systems with structured uncertainty, IEE Proc..UK, 129, 242-250.
[3] ELAAHI, A. LUYBEN, W. L. (1985). Control of an energy-conservative complex configuration of distillation column for four-component separations, Ind. Eng. Chem, Process Des. Dev., 24, 368-376 doi:10.1021/i200029a025
[4] GROSDIDIER, P., MORARI, M. HOLT, B. R. (1985). Closed-loop properties from steady-state gain information, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund., 24, 221-235 doi:10.1021/i100018a015
[5] GROSDIDIER, P. MORARI, M. (1986). Interaction measures for systems under decentralized control, Automatica, 22, 309-319 doi:10.1016/0005-1098(86)90029-4
[6] GROSDIDIER, P. MORARI, M. (1987). A computer aided methodology for the design of decentralized controllers, Comput. chem. Engng., 11, 423-433.
[7] MANOUSIOUTHAKIS, V., SAVAGE, R. ARKUN, Y. (1986). Synthesis of decentralized controllers using the concept of block relative gain, AIChE Journal, 32, 991-1003 doi:10.1002/aic.690320609
[8] McAVOY, T. J. (1983). Interaction Analysis - Principles and Applications, Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NC.
[9] MITARES, G., COLE, J. D., NAUGLE, N. W., PREISIG, H. A. HOLLAND, C. D. (1986). A new criterion for the pairing of control and manipulated variables, AlChE Journal, 32, 1439-1449.
[10] NETT, C. N. SPANG, H. A. III (1987). Control structure design: a missing link in the evolution of modern control theory, Presented at the 1987 American Control Conference, Minneapolis, June 1987.
[11] NIEDERLINSKI, A. (1971). A heuristic approach to the design of linear multivariable control systems, Automatica, 7, 691 doi:10.1016/0005-1098(71)90007-0
[12] SKOGESTAD, S. MORARI, M. (1987). Letter to the Editor, AlChE Journal, 33, 701-702.
[13] SKOGESTAD, S. MORARI, M. (1989). Robust performance of decentralized control systems by independent designs, Automatica, 25, 119-125 doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90127-1
[14] YU, C.-C. LUYBEN, W. L. (1986). Design of multiloop SISO controllers in multivariable processes, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., bf 25, 498-503.

  title={{Variable selection for decentralized control}},
  author={Skogestad, Sigurd and Morari, Manfred},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.