**Page description appears here**

“Comparing PI Tuning Methods in a Real Benchmark Temperature Control System”

Authors: Finn Haugen,
Affiliation: Telemark University College
Reference: 2010, Vol 31, No 3, pp. 79-91.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict


Keywords: PI tuning, air heater, Skogestad´s method, Ziegler-Nichols´ methods, Hägglund and Åström´s method, Tyreus-Luyben´s method, Relay method, Setpoint Overshoot method, Good Gain method

Abstract: This paper demonstrates a number of PI controller tuning methods being used to tune a temperature controller for a real air heater. Indices expressing setpoint tracking and disturbance compensation and stability margin (robustness) are calculated. From these indices and a personal impression about how quick a method is to deliver the tuning result and how simple it is to use, a winning method is identified.

PDF PDF (2309 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2010.3.1



DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] Finn Haugen, Rune Bakke and Bernt Lie (2013), doi:10.4173/mic.2013.3.1
  [2] Jietae Lee, Wonhui Cho and Thomas F. Edgar (2013), doi:10.1021/ie4009919
  [3] David Di Ruscio (2010), doi:10.4173/mic.2010.4.3
  [4] S. Alcántara, R. Vilanova and C. Pedret (2013), doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.01.003
  [5] Mohammad Shamsuzzoha (2013), doi:10.1021/ie401808m
  [6] F. Haugen (2012), doi:10.4173/mic.2012.4.3
  [7] H. Kala, S. Abirami, S. Muthumari and S. Venkatesh (2014), doi:10.3923/jas.2014.1570.1575
  [8] Mohammad Shamsuzzoha (2014), doi:10.1007/s11814-014-0237-6
  [9] Bernt Lie (2013), doi:10.1201/b14561-16
  [10] Md Nishat Anwar, M. Shamsuzzoha and Somnath Pan (2015), doi:10.1007/s13369-015-1582-4
  [11] Thiruppathi. K, Lakshmi Ponnusamy, R. Kirubagaran and M. A. Atmanand (2013), doi:10.1109/ISPCC.2013.6663462
  [12] Mohammad Shamsuzzoha (2016), doi:10.1007/s11771-016-3105-1
  [13] Chriss Grimholt and Sigurd Skogestad (2012), doi:10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00003
  [14] Srinibash Swain and Partha Sarathi Khuntia (2017), doi:10.21833/ijaas.2017.08.020
  [15] A. M. RIBEIRO and R. B. SANTOS (2017), doi:10.5151/chemeng-cobeqic2017-454


References:
[1] Haugen, F., (2010). The Good Gain method for PID controller tuning, TechTeach, http://techteach.no/publications/articles/good_gain_method/good_gain_method.pdf.
[2] Hägglund, T. Åström, K.J. (2002). Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols´ Tuning Rules for PI Control, Asian J. Of Control, 4:364--380.
[3] Luyben, W. Luyben, M. (1997). Essentials of Process Control, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[4] O´Dwyer (2003). A Handbook of Controller Tuning Rules, Imperial College Press, London.
[5] Seborg, D., Edgar, T., Mellichamp, D. (2004). Handbook of Controller Tuning Rules, Process Dynamics and Control.
[6] Shamsuzzoha, M., Skogestad, S., Halvorsen, I. (2010). On-Line PI Controller Tuning Using Closed-Loop Setpoint Response, In Proc. IFAC Conf. on dynamics and control of process systems processes.DYCOPS, Belgium, July.
[7] Skogestad, S. (2003). Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning, Journal of Process Control, 13(4):291--309 doi:10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00062-8
[8] Skogestad, S. (2004). Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning, Modeling, Identification and Control, .2:85--120 doi:10.4173/mic.2004.2.2
[9] Ziegler, J. Nichols, N. (1942). Optimum settings for automatic controllers, Trans. ASME, 64:759--768.
[10] Åström, K.J. Hägglund, T. (1995). PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning, ISA.


BibTeX:
@article{MIC-2010-3-1,
  title={{Comparing PI Tuning Methods in a Real Benchmark Temperature Control System}},
  author={Haugen, Finn},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  volume={31},
  number={3},
  pages={79--91},
  year={2010},
  doi={10.4173/mic.2010.3.1},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}
};

News

May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.


July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.


Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.


Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.


Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.

Smartphone


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.


Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.


Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.


Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.