**Page description appears here**

“Data reconciliation and optimal operation of a Catalytic naphtha reformer”

Authors: Tore Lid and Sigurd Skogestad,
Affiliation: Statoil and NTNU, Department of Chemical Engineering
Reference: 2008, Vol 29, No 4, pp. 117-129.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: Optimization, Data Reconciliation, Simulation, Unit Models, Scaling

Abstract: The naphtha reforming process converts low-octane gasoline blending components to high-octane components for use in high-performance gasoline fuels. The reformer also has an important function as the producer of hydrogen to the refinery hydrotreaters. A process model based on a unit model structure, is used for estimation of the process condition using data reconciliation. Measurements are classified as redundant or non redundant and the model variables are classified as observable, barely observable or unobservable. The computed uncertainty of the measured and unmeasured variables shows that even if a variable is observable it may have a very large uncertainty and may thereby be practically unobservable. The process condition at 21 data points, sampled from two years of operation, was reconciled and used to optimize the process operation. There are large seasonal variations in the reformer product price and two operational cases are studied. In case 1, the product price is high and throughput is maximized with respect to process and product quality constraints. In case 2, the product price is low and the throughput is minimized with respect to a low constraint on the hydrogen production. Based on the characteristics of the optimal operation, a 'self optimizing' control structure is suggested for each of the two operational cases.

PDF PDF (314 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2008.4.1

[1] Bommannan, D., Srivastava, R. D., Saraf, D. N. (1989). Modeling of catalytic naphtha reformers, Canadian journal of chemical engineering. 67:405-411 doi:10.1002/cjce.5450670309
[2] Crowe, C. M. (1989). Observability and redundancy of process data for steady state reconciliation, Chemical Engineering Science. 44(12):2909-2917 doi:10.1016/0009-2509(89)85100-0
[3] Lee, J. W., Ko, Y. C., Jung, Y. K., Lee, K. S., Yoon, E. S. (1997). A modeling and simulation study on a naphtha reforming unit with catalyst circulation and regeneration system, Computers and Chemical Engineering. 21:S1105-S1110.
[4] Lid, T. (2007). Data reconciliation and optimal operation, Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
[5] Lid, T. Skogestad, S. (2007). Effective steady state models for simulation, data reconciliation and optimization, Computers and Chemical Engineering doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.04.003
[6] Matlab. (2000). Optimization Toolbox Version 2,1, The MathWorks Inc., 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098, UNITED STATES.
[7] Romagnoli, J. A. Stephanopoulos, G. (1981). Rectification of process measurement data in the presense of gross errors, Chemical Engineering Science. 36(11):1849-1863 doi:10.1016/0009-2509(81)80133-9
[8] Skogestad, S. (2000). Plantwide control: The search for the self-optimizing control structure, Journal of Process Control. 10:487-507 doi:10.1016/S0959-1524(00)00023-8
[9] Smith, R. B. (1959). Kinetic analysis of naphtha reforming with platinum catalyst, Chemical Engineering Progress. 5.6:76-80.
[10] Stanley, G. M. Mah, R. S. H. (1981). Observability and redundancy in process data estimation, Chemical Engineering Science. 36:259-272 doi:10.1016/0009-2509(81)85004-X
[11] Taskar, U. Riggs, J. B. (1997). Modeling and optimization of a semiregenerative catalytic naphtha reformer, AIChE Journal. 4.3:740-753 doi:10.1002/aic.690430319
[12] Tjoa, I. B. Biegler, L. T. (1991). Simultaneous strategies for data reconciliation and gross error detection of nonlinear systems, Computers and Chemical Engineering. 15(10):679-690 doi:10.1016/0098-1354(91)85014-L

  title={{Data reconciliation and optimal operation of a Catalytic naphtha reformer}},
  author={Lid, Tore and Skogestad, Sigurd},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


Oct 2018: MIC reaches 3000 DOI Forward Links. The last 1000 took 2 years and 5 months.

May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.