**Page description appears here**

“Fluid Flow Simulations of a Vane Separator”

Authors: Aage I. Jøsang and Morten Chr. Melaaen,
Affiliation: Telemark University College
Reference: 2002, Vol 23, No 1, pp. 5-26.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: CFD, vanes, measurement, verification, droplet-gas flow

Abstract: In this work, the fluid flow in a vane separator is simulated by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Detailed measurements of air flow inside a single passage in a vane separator have earlier been presented (Josang and Melaaen 2000). The simulations cover various turbulence models (k-epsilon and RSM turbulence models), near wall treatments, numerical schemes and structured grid as well as un-structured grid simulations. Earlier simulations show that a proper matching between the grid and the near wall treatment is important. However, most important is the effect of the two different numerical schemes together with the turbulence models. The selected numerical schemes are two different first order schemes (the power law scheme and the first order upwind scheme) and the higher order QUICK scheme. Normally, the highest order scheme is asssumed to produce the most accurate result, but in the present work the combination of the best turbulence model (RSM) and QUICK gave the worst result. Most of the other combinations gave good predicted flow fields, although some deviations exist for the prediction of the recirculation zones.

PDF PDF (2115 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2002.1.1

DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] G. Venkatesan, N. Kulasekharan and S. Iniyan (2013), doi:10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.001
  [2] G. Venkatesan, N. Kulasekharan and S. Iniyan (2014), doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.013
  [3] G. Venkatesan, N. Kulasekharan and S. Iniyan (2014), doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.018
  [4] Yichen Xu, Zhenming Yang and Jinsong Zhang (2017), doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.031
  [5] Jianfei Song, Xuefei Hu, Jixiang Zhang and Jianyi Chen (2017), doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.458

[1] Fluent User´s Guide (1996). Release 4,4, august 1996, .
[2] Jøsang Aa. I. Melaaen M.C. (2000). Detailed measurements and simulations of a vane separator, International Conference on Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics, October 17-20, Beijing, China, 2000.
[3] Karki K.C. (1986). A calculation procedure for viscous flows at all speeds in complex geometries, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota.
[4] Keshava Iyer V., Dasgupta A., Venkat Rao B. Srivastava R. (1997). Some investigation on flow through chevrons of moisture separator and reheater used in nuclear power plants, Proceedings of the ASME Fluids Engineering Division, FED-Vol. 244, ASME 1997, pp. 381-386.
[5] Kudo Y., Tanaka N. Miyano H. (1996). An analytical study on the moisture separation performance in dryers, International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Volume 1 - Part A, ASME 1996, pp. 123-129.
[6] Monat J.P., McNulty J., Michelson I.S. Hansen O.V. (1986). Accurate evaluation of chevron mist eliminators, Chemical engineering progress, December 1986.
[7] Nakao T., Nagase M., Aoyama G. Murase M. (1999). Development of simplified wave-type vane in BWR steam dryer and assessment of vane droplet removal characteristics, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 36, No. 5, May 1999, pp. 424-432 doi:10.3327/jnst.36.424
[8] Patankar S.V. (1980). Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C.
[9] Verlaan C. (1991). Performance of novel mist eliminators, Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, Delft University of Technology.
[10] Versteeg H.K. Malalasekera W. (1995). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method, Longman, England.
[11] Wang W. Davies G. A. (1996). CFD studies of separation of mists from gases using vane-type separators, Trans. IChemE, Vol. 74, Part A, March 1996, pp. 232-238.
[12] Wang Y. James P.W. (1998). The calculation of wave-plate demister efficiencies using numerical simulation of the flow field and droplet motion, Third International Conference on Multiphase Flow, ICMF´98, Lyon, France.

  title={{Fluid Flow Simulations of a Vane Separator}},
  author={Jøsang, Aage I. and Melaaen, Morten Chr.},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.