**Page description appears here**

“Controllability measures for disturbance rejection”

Authors: Sigurd Skogestad and Erik A. Wolff,
Affiliation: NTNU, Department of Chemical Engineering
Reference: 1996, Vol 17, No 3, pp. 167-181.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: Input-output controllability, control structure design, relative gain array, relative disturbance gain

Abstract: Some plants have better built-in disturbance rejection capabilities than others, that is, their dynamic resilience (controllability) with respect to disturbance rejection is better. In the paper we consider controller independent disturbance measures for six classes of problems:.

PDF PDF (1632 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.1996.3.1

DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] Kevin W.K. Yee, Jie Bao and Dianne E. Wiley (2012), doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.11.046
  [2] Linh T.T. Dinh, Hans Pasman, Xiaodan Gao and M. Sam Mannan (2012), doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.09.003
  [3] Rodolfo Tellez, William Y. Svrcek and Brent R. Young (2006), doi:10.1080/01457630600672323
  [4] Rodolfo Tellez, William Y. Svrcek, Timothy J. Ross and Brent R. Young (2006), doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.12.002
  [5] Renee C. Gardner and J. Sean Humbert (2014), doi:10.2514/1.C032406
  [6] Qibing Jin and Qie Liu (2014), doi:10.1021/ie502785c
  [7] Brent R. Young, Rodolfo Tellez and William Y. Svrcek (2008), doi:10.1002/cjce.5450840209
  [8] Yi Cao, D. Rossiter and D. Owens (1997), doi:10.1109/CDC.1997.650589
  [9] Changle Xiang, Wei Fan, Hui Liu, Bin Xu and Nan Huang (2015), doi:10.1109/ICUAS.2015.7152412
  [10] Mai Bui, Paul Tait, Mathieu Lucquiaud and Niall Mac Dowell (2018), doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.08.016

[1] BRISTOL, E.H. (1966). On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-11,133-134 doi:10.1109/TAC.1966.1098266
[2] HOVD, M. SKOGESTAD, S. (1992). Simple frequency-dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design, Automatica, 28,989-996 doi:10.1016/0005-1098(92)90152-6
[3] LUYBEN, W.L. (1988). The concept of 'Eigenstructure' in process control, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 206-208 doi:10.1021/ie00073a038
[4] McAVOY, T. J. (1983). Interaction Analysis, ISA Monograph Series, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
[5] McCUNE, L.C. GALLIER, P.W. (1973). Digital simulation: A tool for the analysis and design of distillation controls, ISA Trans., 12, 193-207.
[6] MORARI, M. (1983). Design of resilient process plants III, A general framework for the assessment of dynamic resilience. Chem. Eng. Sci., 38, 1881-1891 doi:10.1016/0009-2509(83)85044-1
[7] MORARI, M., GRIMM, W., OGLESBY, M.J. PROSSER, I.D. (1985). Design of resilient processing plants VII: Design of energy management system for unstable reactors - new insights, Chem. Eng. Sci., 40, 187-198 doi:10.1016/0009-2509(85)80058-0
[8] PERKINS, J.D. (1989). Interactions between process design and process control, Preprints IFAC-symposium DYCORD + ´89, Maastricht, Netherlands, Aug. 1989,349-357.
[9] SHIMIZU, K. MATSUBARA, M. (1985). Directions of disturbances and modeling errors on the control quality in distillation systems, Chem. Eng. Commun., 37, 67-91 doi:10.1080/00986448508911273
[10] SKOGESTAD, S. HOVD, M. (1990). Use of frequency-Dependent RGA for control structure selection, Proc. American Control Conference.ACC, 2133-2139, San Diego. May 1990.
[11] SKOGESTAD, S. MORARI, M. (1987). The effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 2029-2035 doi:10.1021/ie00070a017
[12] SKOGESTAD, S. MORARI, M. (1987). Control configuration selection for distillation columns, AIChE Journal, 33, 1620-1635 doi:10.1002/aic.690331006
[13] STANLEY, G., MARINO-GALARRAGA, M. McAVOY, T.J. (1985). Short-cut operability analysis I, The relative disturbance gain, Ind. Ind. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 24, 1181-1188 doi:10.1021/i200031a048
[14] WALLER, K.V., HÄGGBLOM, K.E., SANDELIN. P.M. FINNERMAN, D.H. (1988). Disturbance sensitivity of distillation control structures, AIChE Journal, 34, 853-858 doi:10.1002/aic.690340516

  title={{Controllability measures for disturbance rejection}},
  author={Skogestad, Sigurd and Wolff, Erik A.},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


Oct 2018: MIC reaches 3000 DOI Forward Links. The last 1000 took 2 years and 5 months.

May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.