**Page description appears here**

“Limiting Factors for the Ability to Achieve Accurate Pressure Control in Long Wells”

Authors: Jan Einar Gravdal, H.B. Siahaan and Knut Steinar Bjørkevoll,
Affiliation: International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS) and SINTEF
Reference: 2018, Vol 39, No 2, pp. 115-129.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict


Keywords: Managed Pressure Drilling, Extended Reach Wells, Flow Modeling, Pressure Control

Abstract: Extended-Reach Drilling (ERD) with narrow pressure margin or uncertain geo-pressure is a challenge with respect to accurate pressure control. The back-pressure Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) method has been widely used in drilling operations with the aim of controlling annulus pressure within safe bounds, and may also be applicable for ERD wells. However, the ability to control the pressure accurately is limited by several factors. Some of which are related to back-pressure MPD operations in general and some of which are more specific to ERD wells. In this paper, a study is presented on how pressure control is affected and sometimes limited by the actual data availability and quality, equipment, hydraulic models, control algorithms, and downhole conditions during an MPD operation in an ERD well. By using a transient well flow model, the theoretically obtainable MPD performance can be simulated. The benefit by utilizing real-time downhole pressure measurements transmitted by a wired drill pipe is demonstrated by simulations. It is shown quantitatively how variations in delay of measurement and bandwidth will influence the ability to control downhole pressure accurately in an ERD well. Benefit by this approach is a more accurate prediction of what is obtainable with MPD and how various factors may influence the ability to control downhole pressure.

PDF PDF (1266 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2018.2.6





References:
[1] Bjorkevoll, K.S., Molde, D.O., and Fjeldberg, H. (2008). Bjorkevoll, K, S., Molde, D.O., and Fjeldberg, H. Utilize Manage Pressure Drilling Equipment and Technique to Cement a Severely Depleted HPHT Reservoir in the North Sea (Russian). Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-115118. doi:10.2118/115118-RU
[2] Bjorkevoll, K.S., Vollen, A.E., BjarneAas, I., and Hovland, S. (2010). Bjorkevoll, K, S., Vollen, A.E., BjarneAas, I., and Hovland, S. Successful Use of Real Time Dynamic Flow Modelling to Control a Very Challenging Managed Pressure Drilling Operation in the North Sea. SPE. doi:10.2118/130311-MS
[3] Carlsen, L.A., Nygaard, G., Gravdal, J.E., Nikolaou, M., and Schubert, J. (2008). Carlsen, L, A., Nygaard, G., Gravdal, J.E., Nikolaou, M., and Schubert, J. Performing the Dynamic Shut-In Procedure Because of a Kick Incident When Using Automatic Coordinated Control of Pump Rates and Choke-Valve Opening. Society of Petroleum Engineers,SPE-113693. doi:10.2118/113693-MS
[4] Cayeux, E., Daireaux, B., Dvergsnes, E.W., and Florence, F. (2013). Cayeux, E, , Daireaux, B., Dvergsnes, E.W., and Florence, F. Toward Drilling Automation: On the Necessity of Using Sensors That Relate to Physical Models. Society of Petroleum Engineers,SPE-163440. doi:10.2118/163440-MS
[5] Godhavn, J.-M. (2010). Godhavn, J, -M. Control Requirements for Automatic Managed Pressure Drilling System. Society of Petroleum Engineers,SPE-119442. doi:10.2118/119442-PA
[6] Gravdal, J.E. and Siahaan, H. (2012). Gravdal, J, E. and Siahaan, H. MPD in depleted reservoirs - With special emphasis on ERD Wells and MPD from floaters. Report IRIS -212/312, SINTEF - 7020077/01/02. .
[7] Hannegan, D.M. and Fisher, K. (2005). Hannegan, D, M. and Fisher, K. Managed Pressure Drilling in Marine Environments. International Petroleum Technology Conference,IPTC-10173, 2005. doi:10.2523/IPTC-10173-MS
[8] Lage, A.C., Fjelde, K.K., and Time, R.W. (2003). Lage, A, C., Fjelde, K.K., and Time, R.W. Underbalanced Drilling Dynamics: Two-Phase Flow Modeling and Experiments. Society of Petroleum Engineers,SPE-83607. doi:10.2118/83607-PA
[9] Lande, H.P. (2013). Lande, H, P. Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Annulus Pressure far Away from Downhole Pressure Measurements. Master Thesis, University of Stavanger. doi:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/183593
[10] Lorentzen, R.J. and Fjelde, K.K. (2005). Lorentzen, R, J. and Fjelde, K.K. Use of slopelimiter techniques in traditional numerical methods for multi-phase flow in pipelines and wells. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. doi:10.1002/fld.952
[11] Lorentzen, R.J., Stordal, A., Nævdal, G., Karlsen, H., and Skaug, H. (2014). Lorentzen, R, J., Stordal, A., Nævdal, G., Karlsen, H., and Skaug, H. Estimation of Production Rates With Transient Well-Flow Modeling and the Auxiliary Particle Filter. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 165582. doi:10.2118/165582-PA
[12] Malloy, K.P., Stone, R., Medley, G.H., Hannegan, D.M., Coker, O.D., Reitsma, D., Santos, H.M., Kinder, J.I., Eck-Olsen, J., McCaskill, J.W., May, J.R., Smith, K.L., and Sonnemann, P. (2009). Malloy, K, P., Stone, R., Medley, G.H., Hannegan, D.M., Coker, O.D., Reitsma, D., Santos, H.M., Kinder, J.I., Eck-Olsen, J., McCaskill, J.W., May, J.R., Smith, K.L., and Sonnemann, P. Managed-Pressure Drilling: What It Is and What It Is Not. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-122281. doi:10.2118/122281-MS
[13] Reitsma, D.G. and Couturier, Y. (2012). Reitsma, D, G. and Couturier, Y. New Choke Controller for Managed Pressure Drilling. IFAC. doi:10.3182/20120531-2-NO-4020.00049
[14] Saeed, S., Lovorn, R., and ArneKnudsen, K. (2012). Saeed, S, , Lovorn, R., and ArneKnudsen, K. Automated Drilling Systems for MPD C-The Reality. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/151416-MS
[15] Siahaan, H.B., Jin, H., and Safonov, M.G. (2012). Siahaan, H, B., Jin, H., and Safonov, M.G. An Adaptive PID Switching Controller for Pressure Regulation in Drilling. IFAC. doi:10.3182/20120531-2-NO-4020.00017
[16] Toft, R.E. (2013). Toft, R, E. Utilization of Planning and Design Data in Drilling Automation and Model Based Process Control on Statfjord. Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2013. doi:http://hdl.handle.net/11250/239998


BibTeX:
@article{MIC-2018-2-6,
  title={{Limiting Factors for the Ability to Achieve Accurate Pressure Control in Long Wells}},
  author={Gravdal, Jan Einar and Siahaan, H.B. and Bjørkevoll, Knut Steinar},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  volume={39},
  number={2},
  pages={115--129},
  year={2018},
  doi={10.4173/mic.2018.2.6},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}
};

News

Oct 2018: MIC reaches 3000 DOI Forward Links. The last 1000 took 2 years and 5 months.


May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.


July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.


Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.


Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.


Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.

Smartphone


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.


Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.


Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.


Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.