**Page description appears here**

“Verification and Examination Management of Complex Systems”

Authors: Stian Ruud and Roger Skjetne,
Affiliation: Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and NTNU, Department of Marine Technology
Reference: 2014, Vol 35, No 4, pp. 333-346.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict


Keywords: Verification management; Verification risk; Audit planning; Audit risk; Complex technical systems

Abstract: As ship systems become more complex, with an increasing number of safety-critical functions, many interconnected subsystems, tight integration to other systems, and a large amount of potential failure modes, several industry parties have identified the need for improved methods for managing the verification and examination efforts of such complex systems. Such needs are even more prominent now that the marine and offshore industries are targeting more activities and operations in the Arctic environment. In this paper, a set of requirements and a method for verification and examination management are proposed for allocating examination efforts to selected subsystems. The method is based on a definition of a verification risk function for a given system topology and given requirements. The marginal verification risks for the subsystems may then be evaluated, so that examination efforts for the subsystem can be allocated. Two cases of requirements and systems are used to demonstrate the proposed method. The method establishes a systematic relationship between the verification loss, the logic system topology, verification method performance, examination stop criterion, the required examination effort, and a proposed sequence of examinations to reach the examination stop criterion.

PDF PDF (711 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2014.4.9





References:
[1] AICPA. (2006). Audit risk and materiality in conducting an audit, Statements on Auditing Standards AU sec. 312 (SAS No. 107), American Inst. Certified Public Accountants. http://www.aicpa.org/research/standards/auditattest/pages/sas.aspx#SAS100, Internet, visited 2014/11/13.
[2] Arens, A., Elder, R., and Beasley, M. (2006). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, Pearson Prentice Hall. http://books.google.no/books?id=JcWuHAAACAAJ.
[3] DNV. (2012). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Redundant Systems, DNV-RP-D102, DNV-GL. https://exchange.dnv.com/publishing/codes/download.asp?url=2012-01/rp-d102.pdf. Internet, visited 2014/11/13.
[4] IEC. (2010). Functional safety of electrical/ electronic/ programmable electronic safety-related systems, IEC 61508, Int. Electrotech. Comm.. http://www.iec.ch/functionalsafety.
[5] NIST/SEMATECH. (2014). e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, 2014. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook, Internet, visited 2014/11/18.
[6] Rausand, M. and Hoyland, A. (2004). System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New Jersey, 2 edition.
[7] Skjetne, R. and Egeland, O. (2006). Hardware-in-the-loop testing of marine control systems, Modeling, Identification and Control. 27(4):239--258. doi:10.4173/mic.2006.4.3
[8] Skjetne, R. and Sorensen, A.J. (2004). Computer-based systems on ships and offshore vessels: The software problem ++, Report, Marine Cybernetics AS, Trondheim, Norway. Joint report by Marine Cybernetics, DNV, Statoil, Smedvig Offshore, Kongsberg Maritime, Norsk Hydro, Stolt Offshore, Eidesvik, Subsea 7, Solstad Offshore, Ulstein, ABB, PSA Norway, and Norwegian Maritime Directorate.


BibTeX:
@article{MIC-2014-4-9,
  title={{Verification and Examination Management of Complex Systems}},
  author={Ruud, Stian and Skjetne, Roger},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  volume={35},
  number={4},
  pages={333--346},
  year={2014},
  doi={10.4173/mic.2014.4.9},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}
};

News

May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.


July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.


Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.


Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.


Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.

Smartphone


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.


Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.


Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.


Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.