**Page description appears here**

“Optimal control strategies with nonlinear optimization for an Electric Submersible Pump lifted oil field”

Authors: Roshan Sharma and Bjørn Glemmestad,
Affiliation: Telemark University College
Reference: 2013, Vol 34, No 2, pp. 55-67.

     Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Keywords: Electric Submersible Pump, nonlinear optimization, optimal control, oil production

Abstract: In an Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) lifted oil field, the ESP of each oil well should be operated inside its operating window. The total power consumed by the ESPs in the oil field should be minimized. The speed of the ESPs and the production choke valve opening should be optimally chosen for maximizing the total oil produced from the oil field. At the same time, the capacity of the separator should not be exceeded. In this paper, nonlinear steady state optimization based on Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) is developed. Two optimal control structures are proposed in this paper. In the first case, the optimal pump speed is controlled by a PI controller by varying the electrical excitation signal to the motors. The optimal fluid flow rate through each oil well is controlled by another PI controller by varying the production choke valve opening. The paper shows that the production choke valve for each oil well has to be always 100% open to maintain the optimal fluid flow rate. In the second case, the production choke valves are considered to be always 100% open as hard constraints. The optimal fluid flow rate through each oil well is controlled by a PI controller by varying the pump speed. It is shown that when the optimal fluid flow rate is tracked by the controller, the speed of each of the pumps is equal to the optimal pump speed calculated by the optimizer. This basically means that we can achieve the optimization objective with the same optimal results as in the first case by using only a single PI controller. The limitations of these two optimal control structures for very low values and for very high values of the separator capacity are discussed. For the feasible range of separator capacities, the optimal locus of the fluid flow rate and the pump speed are shown in this paper.

PDF PDF (1437 Kb)        DOI: 10.4173/mic.2013.2.2

DOI forward links to this article:
  [1] Roshan Sharma and Bjørn Glemmestad (2014), doi:10.7763/IJMO.2014.V4.386
  [2] Roshan Sharma and Sharma Glemmestad (2014), doi:10.7763/IJMO.2014.V4.419
  [3] B. J. T. Binder, D. K. M. Kufoalor, A. Pavlov and T. A. Johansen (2014), doi:10.1109/CCA.2014.6981402
  [4] Morteza Mohammadzaheri, Reza Tafreshi, Zurwa Khan, Matthew Franchek and Karolos Grigoriadis (2015), doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2015.10.009

[1] ANSI/ISA (1989). S75:01: Flow Equations for Sizing Control Valves, Standards and Recommended Practices for Instrumentation and Control, Vol 2, 10th edition.
[2] Brown, K.E. Beggs, H.D. (197). The technology of artificial lift methods, Volume 1, Inflow Performance, Multiphase flow in pipes, The flowing well, PennWell Publishing Company, Tulsa, Oklahoma, ISBN: 0-87814-031-X.
[3] Pedersen, G. Yang, Z. (2008). Efficiency optimization of a multi-pump booster system, In Proc. of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 1611--1618.
[4] Pettersson, F. Westerlund, T. (1996). Global optimization of pump configurations using binary separable programming, Journal of Computers and Chemical Engineering, 21(21):521--529 doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(96)00285-2
[5] Serghide, T.K. (1984). Estimate friction factor accurately, Chemical Engineering, 9.5:63--64.
[6] Sharma, R., Fjalestad, K., Glemmestad, B. (2011). Modeling and control of gas lifted oil field with five oil wells, In 52nd International Conference of Scandinavian Simulation Society, SIMS. Västerås, Sweden, pp. 47--59, ISBN: 978-91-977493-7-4.
[7] Sharma, R. Glemmestad, B. (2013). Modeling and simulation of an electric submersible pump lifted oil field, Submitted to International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology.
[8] Takacs, G. (2009). Electric Submersible Pumps Manual: Design, Operations and Maintenance, Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington, USA.
[9] Westerlund, T., Pettersson, F., Grossmann, I. (1994). Optimization of pump configurations as a minlp problem, Journal of Computers and Chemical Engineering, 18(9):845--858 doi:10.1016/0098-1354(94)E0006-9
[10] Yang, Z., Soleiman, K., Løhndorf, B. (2012). Energy efficient pump control for an offshore oil processing system, In Proc. of the IFAC Workshop on Automatic Control in Offshore Oil and Gas Production. Norwegian Univesity of Sciences and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 257--262.

  title={{Optimal control strategies with nonlinear optimization for an Electric Submersible Pump lifted oil field}},
  author={Sharma, Roshan and Glemmestad, Bjørn},
  journal={Modeling, Identification and Control},
  publisher={Norwegian Society of Automatic Control}


May 2016: MIC reaches 2000 DOI Forward Links. The first 1000 took 34 years, the next 1000 took 2.5 years.

July 2015: MIC's new impact factor is now 0.778. The number of papers published in 2014 was 21 compared to 15 in 2013, which partially explains the small decrease in impact factor.

Aug 2014: For the 3rd year in a row MIC's impact factor increases. It is now 0.826.

Dec 2013: New database-driven web-design enabling extended statistics. Article number 500 is published and MIC reaches 1000 DOI Forward Links.

Jan 2012: Follow MIC on your smartphone by using the RSS feed.


July 2011: MIC passes 1000 ISI Web of Science citations.

Mar 2010: MIC is now indexed by DOAJ and has received the Sparc Seal seal for open access journals.

Dec 2009: A MIC group is created at LinkedIn and Twitter.

Oct 2009: MIC is now fully updated in ISI Web of Knowledge.